Introduction
The budget is a statement presented by the government
of a country with statement of estimated expenditure and revenues for the
following financial year, actual receipts and expenditure of previous year and
proposal of ways and means to raise the receipts and meet the expenditure for
the following financial year. It is the reflection of the position of
government in previous financial year. The union budget for any given year
gives the idea of the revenue and expenditure of the country by using data of
its capital account and revenue account. The budget is said to be in deficit when
expenditure is greater than the revenue, neutral when expenditure is equal to
the revenue and surplus when the expenditure is less than the revenue. In an
ideal world where the government works at its full capability, budget deficit
would be the most viable option for developing countries as their main focus is
on generating additional demand, the development of infrastructure and improve
employment rate. The excessive expenditure by the government will help in
achieving great returns in future which in turn will revive the economy of the
country.
Case Study: The economic slowdown and budget deficit of 2012-2013
The world faced a recession in 2008 which started with
financial crisis in U.S. India was also affected due to the recession and was
curbing to come to come out for recession. Government along with RBI brought in
different policy and measures to increase the growth rate. During the recovery
of the economy, India faced economic slowdown during 2012-2013. The major
economic problems were inflation, fiscal deficit, fall in investment levels and
widening of current account deficit. The economy grew at its slowest in this
period with a growth rate of 4.5% which was estimated to be 5%. “There was a
sharp cut in GDP forecast of 5.2% to 3.7% for fiscal year 2014 estimated by BNP
Paribas, France biggest listed bank”.
Consequences of the Economic Slowdown
The budget deficit was mainly caused due to fiscal
deficit that widened to 5.7% of GDP in 2011-12 and current account deficit that
swelled to 4.8% of GDP during 2012-2012 from 4.2% of GDP in 2011-12. Fiscal
deficit in a budget is total expenditure minus total revenue but the total
revenue here excludes the loans and borrowings of the government that has
repayment liabilities i.e if the fiscal deficit is estimated, it helps us in
determining the loans and borrowings government has taken to compensate for the
excessive expenditure. Since the economy of all the countries were recovering
at that period due to the global recession of 2008, the decline in investment
along with the huge budget deficit was mainly caused due to increasing oil
prices, lower exports and higher imports of metals like gold and coal. A high fiscal deficit was a cause of
concern for the Indian economy as due to it, inflation increased, rate of
interest increased, monetary policy expansion became constrained, external
sector imbalances widened and investment growth and employment took a hit.
To curb the problem of
large budget deficit, the government adopted expansionary fiscal policy.
Expansionary fiscal policy deals with either increase in government spending or
cut in taxes. The government took the initiative by cutting the income tax
which increased the disposable income of the consumers enabling them increase
their spending. The idea was to increase the consumption which is directly
related to increase in aggregate demand with the aim of higher economic growth.
The government also increase their spending to bring injection in the economy
that would stimulate the economic growth and activity. Fiscal policy was preferred over
monetary policy action because the economy was already in steady state and the
scope of increasing money supply or relying on changes brought by central bank that would indirectly
encourage investment was not seen as a viable option. Alternatively, the
increased government spending would increase investment in public work schemes,
creating jobs which will increase income leading to greater aggregate demand.
Limitations of Expansionary Fiscal Policy
It was observed that that due to increase in aggregate demand, the rate
of inflation also increased. The government spent a lot on subsidies and
unemployment benefits due to decrease in their real income. This increase in
government spending was seen sceptical to control leading to widening of the
deficit gap more. Along with these issues, to cover up the extra spending,
government sold their bonds to public and borrowed which led to crowding out
effect that is the investment in private sector decreased and the investment in
government sector increased. The interest rate also increased with the increase
in government spending which further discourage investment. The interest rate
on return of bonds sold by the government also increased, increasing the burden
on the budget. As financial sector was in a bit of turmoil due to massive
non-performing assets, it only led to increase in interest rates declining the
growth of the economy. A lot of policy initiatives were taken but overlapping
of economies along with the limitations of expansionary fiscal policy with the
mismanagement between the fiscal and monetary policy lead to derailing of the
economy.
Analysis of Expansionary fiscal policy with IS-LM framework
The IS-LM framework put forward by Keynes analyses the importance of expansionary and contractionary fiscal and monetary policy in increasing the output and growth of the economy. It also gives an overview of the policy effectiveness of IS-LM framework. Different school of thoughts have different opinions on the influence of budget deficit on the economic growth.
The framework explains
the effectiveness of expansionary fiscal policy. It claims that if there is
increase in government spending or decrease in tax rates, there will be an
increase in income lesser to what it had been due to crowding out effects which
will increase the rate of interest.
Conclusion
The Indian economy has always been a challenge because of the demographic factors, population, and effectiveness of policies in present times. The economic slowdown decreased the growth of economy for 2011-2014 and took almost five years to bring a stable growth rate in the economy. The budget of India has always been deficit in nature due to the massive past loans and borrowings, government took when the country became newly independent as India was not self-sufficient as they had just emerged from the British dominion. Keynesians approach of IS-LM tries to provide a way to decrease these deficits but the Indian economy is a lot more complex than the economic situation given in the framework making it difficult for India to overcome its budget deficit. Not only this, as our country is still developing, we need to borrow to develop our infrastructure to increase demand and generate employment. Many different combinations are being used by the economists to combat the problem of budget deficit and with the guidance of the government in correct way, India will be able to decrease the gap of their budget deficit in near future.
Reference
Solomon, R. (1984). Budget
Deficits and Federal Reserve Policy. The Brookings Review, 2(3),
22-25. doi:10.2307/20079831
Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20079831
Pettinger, T. (July, 2019). Impact of
Expansionary Fiscal Policy.
Retrieved from https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/617/economics/impact-of-expansionary-fiscal-policy/
Asit Ranjan Mishra (February, 2014) GDP
growth in 2012-13 worse than expected
Retrieved
from https://www.livemint.com/Politics/burPSwwZ4JstNqkBGGWXCP/Economy-grows-45-in-fiscal-2013.html
India's Economic Problems: Difficult Road
Ahead?
Retrieved
from https://www.icmrindia.org/CaseStudies/catalogue/Economics/India's%20Economic%20Problems-Excerpts.htm#Current_Account_Deficit
Panagariya, A. (January, 2020). 2012-13, 2013-14
slowdowns were a lot worse than the present one: Arvind Panagariya. Retrieved from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/expert-view/2012-13-2013-14-slowdowns-were-a-lot-worse-than-the-present-one-arvind-panagariya/articleshow/73609324.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Devereux,
M. B. Fiscal Deficits, Debt, and Monetary Policy in a Liquidity Trap. Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute. Working
Paper No. 44. Retrieved from
http://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/wpapers/2010/0044.pdf



Very informative piece! Good job!
ReplyDeleteGreat write-up! Very informative!
ReplyDeleteAmazing portrayal of the economic condition. Keep up the good work
ReplyDeleteLucid and informative
ReplyDeleteVery informative!! Good job!
ReplyDeleteWell articulated and documented
ReplyDeleteVery well potrayed
ReplyDeleteWell articulated & documented. Great work!!
ReplyDeleteGood job !!
ReplyDeleteInformative and a good read!!
ReplyDeleteThis is so good and detailed 👌🔥
ReplyDeleteKeep it up! Great work
ReplyDeleteVery well explained and detailed.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work!!
Kee it up! Great work
ReplyDeleteVery well explained with nice graphical analysis.
ReplyDelete